I went to see it with Katie tonight and I have issues with it. Not the kind you might think, though, so wait before forming that thought. Nevermind, you already formed it, didn’t you? Right. This is an informal presentation of different women portraying an informal study of women talking about, you guessed, their vagina. On the whole, I thought the substance of the show was good, by that, I mean, the words that were used and the order of them was very powerful. It got the point across that the word vagina is taboo and that women need a safe community in which to feel comfortable to discuss vaginal things. I think reading the play would have been more powerful for me, but that’s because 13 out of the 17 women on stage took refuge behind the cards that everyone held. I understand the idea behind the cards, it is not the women directly talking about vaginas, but instead relaying common knowledge of all women that no one speaks about. It is a postmodern technique to portray the power of ordinary women’s words into art. I don’t have a problem with actors reading off of cards, especially when it is used effectively. The problem is that most of the women were NOT actors at all. They were charlatans parading on stage with only their membership cards for the female race to guarantee them admittance. This statement includes the man in drag as well. I think he was there for gasp effect only. Whatever. I paid $9.00 a ticket to see non-actors portraying other non-actors on stage. It wasn’t pretty. Four women shone as semi-professional actors and they stuck out like sore thumbs. The whole production had a lopsided feel to it and I was a little seasick by the end.
Still, the monologues were better than the women who ANSWERED her cell phone a row down from us. Who said it was ok to take a phone call in the middle of ANY performance? I didn’t get up and start flipping people off in the middle of the show and I equate this with answering your goddamn phone in the middle of my sea voyage, woman! I’m ok with women being “vagina warriors” as coined from the show, but be respectful of my experience. I want to hear the “actors” not the conversation with your grandmother about beets.
Katie, on the other hand, had a problem with them portraying women raped in Bosnia right after a monologue about orgasmic moans. Katie told me that the rape monologue is more important than the orgasmic moans and shouldn’t be put in the same show. I disagree on the basis that it is art, though, not very good art in my opinion. Any thoughts, reader?